全国一卷英语试卷，校对版
Since the dawn of philosophy, thinkers from Plato to Kant have considered how beauty affects human experience, and whether it has the power to transform our state of mind.
Now, a new study from the University of Cambridge suggests that stopping to contemplate（consider) the beauty of artistic objects in a gallery or museum boosts our ability to think in abstract ways and consider the “bigger picture” when it comes to our lives.设问点
Participants were randomly split into two groups: the ‘beauty’ group was asked to actively consider and then rate the beauty of each ceramic object they viewed, while the second group just matched a line drawing of the object with the artwork itself.All participants were then tested on how they process information, and if it’s in a more practical or abstract way.
Across all participants, those in the beauty group scored almost 14% higher on average than the control group in abstract thinking. While they were told the study was about cognitive processes, participants were asked about interests, with around half saying they had an artistic hobby.问实验
“Our findings offer empirical support for a long-standing philosophical idea that beauty appreciation can help people detach from their immediate practical concerns and adopt a broader, more abstract perspective,” said Mikalonytė.
“People today are often tethered(chained) to their devices, and we usually think in very concrete terms when we’re doing something on a screen,” added Schnall.
“It’s becoming much rarer to zone out and just let the mind wander, but that’s when we think in ways that broaden our horizons. Admiring the beauty of art may be the ideal way to trigger the abstract cognitive processes increasingly lost in a world of screens and smartphones.”
问实验目的What does the experiment focus on?
The relationship between art and broad thinking
实验过程，How did the experiment survey ？
By asking them questions
问实验结果，
Whatcan we infer from the result？
beauty appreciation has a beneficial impact
问建议或者文章大意句
What should we do ?
Dive into the wandering process
以下是实际的命题，高级
Since the dawn of philosophy, thinkers from Plato to Kant have considered how beauty affects the human mind. Now, a new study from the University of Cambridge suggests that contemplating the beauty of artistic objects boosts our ability to think in abstract ways and see the bigger picture.
Researchers say engaging with beauty helps us escape the mental trappings of daily life and break our everyday patterns of thought, shifting us into a more expansive state of mind.
A team of Cambridge psychologists used the University's modern art gallery as a living laboratory. For the study, 187 people visited an exhibition of handmade clay objects. "Ceramics (陶瓷) were ideal," said Professor Simone Schnall. "A glorious painting would be too striking. We needed art subtle in form, requiring focused contemplation."
Participants were split into two groups. The beauty group was asked to give a rating of how beautiful each object was, while the control group simply matched a line drawing with the artwork. The rating task, though simple, made all the difference.
The beauty group scored almost 14% higher than the control group in abstract thinking, and reported greater interest in life's bigger questions. They also felt more moved, enlightened and inspired.
Importantly, however, the beauty group felt no happier than the control group. The researchers asked about these feelings on purpose:by ruling out mood, they could pin down the true factor behind the improved thinking. It was the engagement with beauty itself, not the difficulty of the task or any passing good mood.
"People today are often tethered to their devices, thinking in very concrete terms," added Schnall. "Admiring beauty may be the ideal way to trigger the abstract, critical
thinking increasingly lost in a world of screens." The findings, she suggests, point to a simple lesson: encouraging people to slow down and engage with beauty can sharpen the way they think.
32. What was the task of the "beauty" group?
A. Matching line drawings with objects. B. Rating how beautiful each object was. C. Creating their own clay objects. D. Describing their daily worries.
33. According to the study, which group was more likely to think beyond daily life?
A. The beauty group, who showed greater interest in bigger questions.
B. The beauty group, who felt much happier afterwards.
C. The control group, who showed stronger abstract thinking.
D. The control group, who felt more enlightened.
34. Why did the researchers ask about the participants' feelings?
A. To compare the two groups' scores.
B. To judge their specific thinking pattern.
C. To measure the difficulty of the task.
D. To identify the true factor behind the results.
35. What does the study encourage people to do?
A. Visit galleries more often.
B. Spend less time on screens.
C. Buy handmade ceramics.
D. Develop their critical thinking.
2026新高考I卷阅读D篇 深度命题解析
✅ 实验类科技说明文标杆题 | 拆解剑桥大学"美与思维"研究逻辑 | 破解"张冠李戴""偷换概念""过度引申"三大高频陷阱
一、语篇核心逻辑（实验类标准模型）
这是新高考最常考的实证研究类说明文，严格遵循"背景引入→核心结论→实验设计→结果验证→现实意义"的黄金逻辑链。
plaintext
【学术背景】从柏拉图到康德，哲学家一直思考美对人类思维的影响
↓
【核心结论】欣赏艺术美能提升抽象思维能力，让人看到更大的格局
↓
【实验设计】
- 地点：剑桥大学现代美术馆
- 对象：187名参与者
- 材料：手工陶瓷（形式含蓄，需要专注凝视）
- 分组：
✅ 实验组（美组）：给每件艺术品的美感打分
❌ 对照组：将线稿与艺术品匹配
↓
【实验结果】
1. 美组抽象思维得分高14%，更关注人生大问题
2. 关键验证：两组幸福感无差异→排除情绪干扰
↓
【现实意义】屏幕时代，慢下来欣赏美是激活抽象、批判性思维的最佳方式
二、核心考察能力矩阵
题号 考察能力 命题层级 全国平均失分率
32 实验细节精准定位 基础题 12%
33 实验结果对比辨析 中档题 38%
34 实验设计逻辑理解 偏难题 45%
35 研究结论应用推断 压轴题 52%
命题人命题意图：这篇文章完美体现新高考"重逻辑、轻刷题"的导向。它不考简单的原词定位，而是考学生能否理解科学实验的因果逻辑，区分"实验现象"与"实验结论"、"背景信息"与"核心主张"。
三、逐题·命题人深层逻辑复盘
第32题：实验细节题（基础题）
题目：What was the task of the "beauty" group?
答案：B. Rating how beautiful each object was.
1. 命题设计思路
- 核心考点：区分实验组与对照组的不同任务，检验学生的信息分类能力
- 命题陷阱：将对照组的任务包装成正确选项，利用学生"看漏关键词"的刷题习惯
2. 逻辑灰度分析
选项 错误类型 命题人陷阱设计
A. Matching line drawings with objects. 张冠李戴 这是对照组的任务，不是美组的
C. Creating their own clay objects. 无中生有 参与者只是参观展览，没有制作陶瓷
D. Describing their daily worries. 无中生有 全文未提及描述日常烦恼
原文依据：The beauty group was asked to give a rating of how beautiful each object was, while the control group simply matched a line drawing with the artwork.
3. 反刷题思维
🔥 实验类文章第一原则：实验组对照组必须分开标记
看到"split into two groups"时，立刻用不同符号标注两组的任务、结果，永远不要混淆。正确选项一定是实验组专属的内容。
第33题：实验结果题（中档题）
题目：According to the study, which group was more likely to think beyond daily life?
答案：A. The beauty group, who showed greater interest in bigger questions.
1. 命题设计思路
- 核心考点：精准提取实验结果，排除与原文矛盾的干扰项
- 命题陷阱：将原文明确否定的内容（"no happier"）反过来包装成正确选项，利用学生的主观臆断
2. 逻辑灰度分析
选项 错误类型 命题人陷阱设计
B. The beauty group, who felt much happier afterwards. 正反混淆 原文明确指出"the beauty group felt no happier than the control group"
C. The control group, who showed stronger abstract thinking. 正反混淆 美组抽象思维得分更高，不是对照组
D. The control group, who felt more enlightened. 正反混淆 感到更受启发的是美组
原文依据：The beauty group... reported greater interest in life's bigger questions. They also felt more moved, enlightened and inspired.
3. 反刷题思维
🔥 绝对不要加入自己的主观判断
原文说什么就是什么。很多学生想当然地认为"欣赏美会让人更开心"，但实验明确排除了情绪的影响，这正是命题人设置的最大陷阱。
第34题：实验目的题（偏难题）
题目：Why did the researchers ask about the participants' feelings?
答案：D. To identify the true factor behind the results.
1. 命题设计思路
- 核心考点：理解科学实验的控制变量法，检验学生的逻辑推理能力
- 命题陷阱：将"实验手段"包装成"实验目的"，利用学生对实验流程的不熟悉
2. 逻辑灰度分析
选项 错误类型 命题人陷阱设计
A. To compare the two groups' scores. 手段≠目的 比较分数是实验的步骤，不是问情绪的目的
B. To judge their specific thinking pattern. 无中生有 没有提到判断思维模式
C. To measure the difficulty of the task. 无中生有 没有提到测量任务难度
原文依据：by ruling out mood, they could pin down the true factor behind the improved thinking.
（通过排除情绪的影响，他们就能确定思维提升背后的真正原因）
3. 反刷题思维
🔥 问"为什么做某事"，永远找"to/in order to/by doing"引导的目的状语
科学实验中所有额外的步骤，都是为了排除干扰变量，确定真正的因果关系。记住这个核心逻辑，这类题永远不会错。
第35题：结论推断题（压轴题）
题目：What does the study encourage people to do?
答案：A. Visit galleries more often.
1. 命题设计思路
- 核心考点：从研究结论推断其现实指导意义，检验学生的归纳概括能力
- 命题陷阱：将"背景信息"和"间接结果"包装成"核心主张"，利用学生"过度引申"的思维习惯
2. 逻辑灰度分析
选项 错误类型 命题人陷阱设计
B. Spend less time on screens. 背景≠主张 这是研究的背景（人们被设备束缚），不是研究鼓励的行为
C. Buy handmade ceramics. 以偏概全 陶瓷只是实验用的材料，不是研究的核心
D. Develop their critical thinking. 结果≠目的 批判性思维是欣赏美带来的结果，不是研究直接鼓励的行为
原文依据：Admiring beauty may be the ideal way to trigger the abstract, critical thinking... encouraging people to slow down and engage with beauty can sharpen the way they think.
（欣赏美是激活批判性思维的理想方式→鼓励人们多欣赏美→多去美术馆是最直接的方式）
3. 反刷题思维
🔥 研究鼓励的行为=研究核心结论的直接落地
- 核心结论：欣赏艺术美能提升思维能力
- 直接落地：多去美术馆、博物馆欣赏艺术
- 永远不要选"间接结果"（提升批判性思维）或"背景问题"（少看屏幕）
四、实验类科技文 通用解题方法论
1. 阅读步骤
1. 先看题干，标记关键词：重点标记"实验组/对照组/任务/结果/目的"
2. 通读全文，梳理实验逻辑：用箭头画出"问题→假设→实验→结果→结论"的链条
3. 定位原文，对比选项：每个选项都要找到原文依据，不要凭印象答题
2. 常见干扰项类型
- 张冠李戴：把A的特点说成B的
- 正反混淆：把原文否定的说成肯定的
- 无中生有：原文根本没有提到的内容
- 过度引申：从原文推导出没有直接依据的结论
- 以偏概全：用局部代替整体
3. 黄金解题口诀
实验分组先标清，任务结果要分清；
问目的找to引导，问结论看尾段行；
主观臆断不可取，原文依据是真经。
